Note: JavaScript is represented here as “Node”. John Hardy Lambda March 19, 2017 1 Minute Note: JavaScript is represented here as “Node”. https://erikbern.com/2017/03/15/the-eigenvector-of-why-we-moved-from-language-x-to-language-y.html Share this: Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Like Loading... Related Published by John Hardy Closures are a poor man's object. Objects are a poor man's closure. View all posts by John Hardy Published March 19, 2017
Dunno but the JavaScript framework one rings true to me and seems up to date. Vuejs is doing surprisingly well and there appears to be a mass exodus away from Angular. LikeLike Reply
Yep. There are some good things about Angular2 but really the developer experience is not that good. Developer experience matters. I’ve been directing Angular1 refugees to check out Vuejs which apart from being extremely fast feels a lot like Angular1 but without the cruft. LikeLike Reply
John Hardy Developer 
Dunno but the JavaScript framework one rings true to me and seems up to date.
Vuejs is doing surprisingly well and there appears to be a mass exodus away from Angular.
LikeLike
Yes, I suspected Angular was doomed when they announced the direction for Angular 2.
LikeLike
Yep. There are some good things about Angular2 but really the developer experience is not that good. Developer experience matters.
I’ve been directing Angular1 refugees to check out Vuejs which apart from being extremely fast feels a lot like Angular1 but without the cruft.
LikeLike