Remote attackers just need to send a message 💬 on Signal to inject & execute malicious code onto targeted…

Remote attackers just need to send a message 💬 on Signal to inject & execute malicious code onto targeted systems—without requiring any recipients’ interaction

Electron is not a secure platform.

10 thoughts on “Remote attackers just need to send a message 💬 on Signal to inject & execute malicious code onto targeted…

  1. At least Signal is being okay with this disclosure. I can’t expect FB’s Whatsapp to be this open about their vulnerabilities. All these years of using it, not once there is a scare to prompt users to use an updated client.

    The way the old CCleaner (before the Avast buyout) actively prompted their users to update because of a trojan bug should be the norm, not the exception.

    Like

  2. John Hardy Turnbull delenda est Unless that person has gotten used to the ideas in Chrome OS (apps are basically PWAs), perhaps people have gotten used to the idea of clicking that Internet icon thing and typing out, then autofilling the name of the site/ open bookmark for the “apps” they use.

    Maybe its just me but if people are to be retrained/retaught in their thinking of web sites like FB/Instagram as apps, would people readily embrace PWAs or pfft, old fashioned way is the way?

    Even I absent mindedly open Spotify’s web client although I have installed the desktop clients on the machines I use. I am getting on with age already..

    Like

  3. Just putting this out there: X11 over SSH is still a thing, lots of widget toolkits are built on top of it, and it’s easier than ever before to port more libX11 client apps to more operating systems!!!

    It’s still a no-go on touch screen devices, but if we’re talking about desktop apps, then why not?

    Like

Leave a comment